The Case For and Against Applying 28 USC § 1782 to International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals
September 16, 2020
Webinar begins at 11:30 am Central
Duration: 60 minutes
IEL: +1.972.244.3422
Fax: +1.972.244.3401
E-Mail: iel@cailaw.org
Overview
Until 2004, it seemed to be settled law that international commercial arbitration tribunals did not fall within the ambit of Section 1782, which allows a litigant outside the United States to apply to an American court to obtain evidence for use in a non-US proceeding. The only Courts of Appeal to decide whether an international commercial arbitration tribunal was a foreign or international tribunal within Section 1782 held that they were not. See National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., 165 F.3d 184 (2nd Cir. 1999) (“NBC”); Republic of Kazakhstan v. Biedermann International, 168 F.3d 880 (5th Cir. 1999)(“Biedermann”).
The Section 1782 landscape shifted significantly in late 2019 and 2020. The Sixth and Fourth Circuit parted company with the Second and Fifth Circuit. Expressly rejecting NBC and Beidermann, both held that international commercial arbitration tribunals are foreign or international tribunals for purposes of Section 1782. Servotronics, Inc. v. The Boeing Company and Rolls-Royce PLC, Docket No. 18-2454 (4th Cir. 2020); In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings, 939 F.3d 710, 723 (6th Cir. 2019). Not to be outdone, on July 8, 2020, the Second Circuit confirmed its prior ruling the international commercial arbitration tribunals do not qualify as foreign tribunals under Section 1782. In re: Application and Petition of Hanwei Guo, No. 19-781 (2d Cir. July 8, 2020).
Moderated by Tom Sikora, David Zaslowsky and David Livshiz will debate opposing sides of the issue.
Webinar begins at 11:30 am Central
Duration: 60 minutes
Details for connecting to the webinar will be sent after you register.
Moderator

Senior Counsel, International Disputes
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Spring, Texas
Tom Sikora is Senior Counsel, International Disputes Group at Exxon Mobil Corporation. Tom manages international commercial and investment arbitration for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Prior to joining ExxonMobil, he spent ten years at El Paso Corporation managing the company’s international arbitration and complex litigation. Tom initially practiced international arbitration of energy, construction and insurance disputes at Vinson & Elkins LLP in Houston, Texas. Tom is a member of the Council (formerly Board of Directors) of the American Arbitration Association and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the Institute for Transnational Arbitration, where he serves as Senior Vice Chair. Tom also serves as a Co-Chair of the Energy Arbitrators List. He is a former officer of the IBA Arbitration Committee and former member of the ICC Commission on Arbitration. Tom graduated from Harvard with an A.B. in History and Literature and from the University of Virginia School of Law with a J.D.
Debaters

Partner
Baker McKenzie
New York, New York
David Zaslowsky chairs the Litigation Department of Baker McKenzie's New York office, and practices in the area of general commercial litigation and arbitration. He is the editor of the Firm's blockchain blog and co-editor of the Firm's International Litigation & Arbitration Newsletter. David has a degree in computer science and has worked on numerous technical-related disputes. He has also worked on many cases involving issues of international litigation, including matters related to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the Alien Tort Claims Act, forum non conveniens, obtaining discovery in aid of foreign proceedings under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782, and foreign attachments. David has been included for a number of years in the Chambers USA Guide and Chambers Global Guide for his expertise in International Arbitration.

Counsel
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP
New York, New York
David Livshiz represents clients in complex commercial disputes, criminal and civil fraud actions, and bankruptcy litigation. He also works with companies and individuals in criminal and civil investigations conducted by the US Department of Justice, the Attorneys’ Office, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various other regulatory agencies. David assists clients in a broad array of contexts, including jury trials, proceedings pending before federal and state trial and appellate courts, and as debtors and creditors in bankruptcy proceedings (including in adversary proceedings and contested matters). He has worked in all stages of litigation, from initial investigations to trial. Additionally, David has significant experience representing financial institutions and corporations from countries of the former Soviet Union, as well as US companies engaged in business in the region, on their litigation and regulatory exposure in the United States. Additionally, David has significant experience representing financial institutions and corporations from countries of the former Soviet Union, as well as US companies engaged in business in the region, on their litigation and regulatory exposure in the United States.
Tuition
- $0 - IEL Advisory Board Member
- $0 - ITA Advisory Board Member
- $0 - IEL Supporting or Sustaining Member Employee
- $0 - ITA Supporting or Sustaining Member Employee
- $25 - IEL Young Energy Professional Member
- $25 - ITA Young Arbitrator Member
- $50 - Non-Member
CLE Credit
Texas Course Number 174097322. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.0 credit hours, of which no credit hours will apply to ethics/professional responsibility credit.
This online program has not been approved for MCLE credit in any other jurisdictions. If requested by attendees, CAIL will request accreditation in California, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Accreditation has not been sought or approved in these jurisdictions at this time. MCLE credit will not be requested in any other jurisdiction.
Although attendees may be able to request MCLE credit directly in additional jurisdictions, the rules vary in each jurisdiction. Certain programs, subjects, and formats may not receive credit in certain jurisdictions and there may be specific rules regarding who may earn credit or the maximum number of credit hours that may be earned with specific formats. Please review the MCLE regulations and rules of your jurisdiction and contact your regulatory entity if you have specific questions about the jurisdiction’s MCLE rules.
Other Information
We will be using a third party platform to host the webinar/event. By registering for this event, your email address and personal information will be used by the webinar organizer to communicate with you about this event and other services.
Nondiscriminatory Policy
The Center for American and International Law does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other protected status in educational activities, scholarship programs or admissions.
Privacy Policy
We do not sell or rent information to any outside parties. By providing your information, you will receive postal and electronic communications from the Institute for Energy Law (IEL) of The Center for American and International Law (CAIL) in accordance with CAIL's Privacy Policy. If we co-sponsor a program with another organization, information may be shared between the parties. All such co-sponsors will be identified on the event details and registration page. At any point, you can opt-out or unsubscribe by selecting either link at the bottom of each email or call us at 972.244.3400.